Hide table of contents

Summary

  • My new book on longtermism, What We Owe The Future, will come out this summer
  • You can now pre-order a copy (US link, UK link)
  • If you want to help with the book launch, I think pre-ordering is probably the highest-impact thing you can do right now

 

Longer Summary

I’ve written a book!!

It’s called What We Owe The Future. It makes the case for longtermism — the view that positively affecting the long-run future is a key moral priority of our time — and explores what follows from that view. As well as the familiar topics of AI and extinction risk, it also discusses value lock-in, civilisational collapse and recovery, technological stagnation, population ethics, and the expected value of the future. I see it as a sequel to Doing Good Better, and a complement to The Precipice

I think I’ve probably worked harder on this project than on any other in my life, and I’m excited that the launch date is finally now in sight: Aug 16th in the US and Sep 1st in the UK. I’m looking forward to being able to share it and discuss it with you all!

I’m now focused on trying to make the book launch go well. I’d really like to use the launch as a springboard for wider promotion of longtermism, trying to get journalists and other influencers talking about the idea. In order to achieve that, a huge win would be to hit The New York Times Bestseller list. And in order to achieve that, getting as many pre-orders as possible is crucial. 

In particular, there’s a risk that the book is perceived by booksellers (like Amazon and Barnes and Noble) as being “just another philosophy book”, which means they buy very few copies to sell to consumers. This means that the booksellers don’t put any effort into promoting the book, and they can even literally run out of copies (as happened with Superintelligence after the Elon tweet). Preorders are the clearest way for us to demonstrate that WWOTF (or, as I prefer, “WTF?”) is in a different reference class. 

For these reasons, I think that pre-ordering WWOTF is probably the highest value thing you can do to help with the book launch right now. The US link to pre-order is here, the UK link is here, and for all other countries you can use your country’s Amazon link.
 

                                                                      US version                                   

                                                                              UK version 


 

About the book 

My hope for WWOTF is that it will be like an Animal Liberation for future generations: impacting broadly how society thinks about the interests of future people, and inspiring people to take action to safeguard the long term. If the launch goes well, then significantly more people — including people who are deciding which careers to pursue, philanthropists, and political decision-makers and policy-makers — will be exposed to the core ideas.  

The book is aimed to be both readable for a general audience and informative for EA researchers or interested academics. (Though I’m not sure if I’ve succeeded at this!) So there’s a wide breadth of content: everything from stories of historical instances of long-run impact to discussion of impossibility theorems in population ethics. And, following Toby Ord’s lead, there is an ungodly number of endnotes.


The table of contents can give you the gist:  

  • Introduction
  • Part I. The Long View
    • Chapter 1: The Case for Longtermism
    • Chapter 2: You Can Shape the Course of History
  • Part II. Trajectory Changes
    • Chapter 3: Moral Change
    • Chapter 4: Value Lock-In
  • Part III. Safeguarding Civilization
    • Chapter 5: Extinction
    • Chapter 6: Collapse
    • Chapter 7: Stagnation
  • Part IV. Assessing the End of the World
    • Chapter 8: Is It Good to Make Happy People?
    • Chapter 9: Will the Future Be Good or Bad?
  • Part V. Taking Action
    • Chapter 10: What to Do

 

In the course of writing the book, I’ve also changed my mind on a number of issues. I hope to share my updates before launch.

 

Why early pre-orders are important

If you plan on ordering the book at some point, I’d greatly appreciate it if you could order it now. 

Early pre-orders have many advantages in the world of publishing which will lead to greater promotion of the book once it’s released in August:

  1. Pre-orders count as first week sales in the eyes of the New York Times Bestseller list, so if we drive a lot of pre-orders now, What We Owe The Future will be much more likely to hit the bestseller list in the first week.
    1. This matters because (a) many people look to bestseller lists to guide which books they buy, and (b) being on the list also leads to more press opportunities. It’s hard to know the exact effect of this, but one 2004 study found that appearing on the New York Times Best-Seller list increased first-time authors’ sales by 57 percent, and on average, for a book’s first year on shelves, it increased sales by 13 or 14 percent.
  2. Early pre-orders also signal to major booksellers that the book is popular, which leads them (a) to order more of the book and (b) market the book more prominently on their websites and in their bookstores.
    1. This means booksellers are more likely to partner with us for discounts and promotions, since they will have a lot of the book in stock that they’ll want to sell.
    2. Lastly, when booksellers buy more of the book, it makes it less likely that they will run out of stock, as happened with Superintelligence, and sapped some of the momentum for sales.

I’m also excited to talk with potential readers, so as a thank-you for your support and interest, I’ll arrange to have Zoom chats about the book with eight randomly-chosen people who’ve preordered. If you’re interested in that, then submit a screenshot of your receipt to the form included here; we’ll send out invites on May 1st. 

 

FAQs

Should I share the book on social media?

  • If you have a decently-sized EA social media following that you think would be interested in ordering the book several months before its launch, I’d love for you to share the pre-order link!
  • If your social media following is primarily non-EAs and you’d prefer to only post about the book once, you should probably hold off on posting until nearer to the book launch. Most authors do not attempt to drive pre-orders this early in their campaign due to a lower conversion rate —  people typically don’t buy books so early in advance.

I want to purchase 20 or more copies of What We Owe The Future. What should I do?

  • Contact abie@forethought.org to help arrange this.

I’m a group organiser. Should I tell my university/local group to purchase the book?

  • If you think your group might be interested in purchasing the book, I’d be thrilled for you to share.
  • Also note that you can order other EA books for your university group via EA Books Direct
  • If you are interested in doing a centralised order of 20 or more books for the fall semester, please contact abie@forethought.org.

Should I purchase the hardcover or the Kindle version?

  • Purchasing the hardcover version is more advantageous for reaching the bestsellers list and convincing booksellers to order more of the book. But of course this is up to your reading preferences!

If you have any other questions about promotion for the book, you can email Abie at abie@forethought.org.

Comments36


Sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:
mic
15
0
0

Any chance the price could be reduced to lower the barrier to pre-ordering? It costs $30 on Amazon US for a hard copy, which is a lot to ask for.

When I ordered on Amazon (UK), it said that I'd be charged the lowest price they offer between now and the launch date, so if there are any (further) discounts later on, I'll get them. I'm guessing this is the same for the US.

I can confirm that's the case for Amazon US as well.

"If the Amazon.com price decreases between the time you place your order and the end of the day of the release date, you'll receive the lowest price, either through a price adjustment in your unshipped order, or through a refund within 24-72 hours following the release date."

The price is set by the publisher, so for now there's nothing we can do directly reduce the price of the book on Amazon, etc. (In the future, an EA publishing house could make sure EA books are priced more accessibly! See Fin Moorhouse's post here

In the coming months, we'll likely partner with bookstores to do pre-order discounts (eg. 25% off), and EA groups can use funding to purchase copies of the book for their members. So if pre-ordering now is price prohibitive, there will be other opportunities later on to pre-order. 

Curious to know what kind of services a publisher provides, in this case I imagine the PR team and outreach is not being spearheaded (or paid for by the publisher)? Can someone steel man for me? 

I'm pre-ordering a copy! And I want to strong +1 that I think the case for pre-ordering the book could be quite high impact.

I was able to read a draft, and I wanted to share that I really liked the intro and first chapter. I really wish I had read those when I was a first year in university. 

Pre-ordered a hard copy. Very excited for this book - some incredible reviews from some big names!

Pre-ordered a hardcover copy! 

Curious for more specifics on the hardcover vs. Kindle thing. Are Kindle pre-orders counted as some fraction of a hardcover order? If so, what is that fraction?

Thanks, Garrison!

My understanding is that hardcover and e-book sales are counted for different categories of The New York Times Bestsellers List. (There are several categories for non-fiction: hardcover, paperback, e-book, and combined print and e-book.) 

Reaching the hardcover bestseller list tends to get more attention for new releases than the e-book bestseller list, so it's a more valuable list to be on. 

This does not seem to be correct.  The list you linked for e-books is dated 2017, which partly explains why it has old books.  The current NYT list is combined:

https://www.nytimes.com/books/best-sellers/combined-print-and-e-book-nonfiction/

Methodology here:

https://www.nytimes.com/books/best-sellers/methodology/

Correct me if I'm wrong

Ah, thank you for pointing out the outdated e-book link! (Just edited to remove.) The bestseller list switched from having just e-books as a category to a combined print and e-books category, as you describe. It's still advantageous to order the hardcover since this list is given more attention for new books, and it is more difficult to hit the combined print  and e-book list, since it involves competing with more books. 

Pre-ordered my hardcover! I'm excited :) 

Awesome, really looking forward to reading the book! :) 

Just in case, are the two book covers already set in stone?

Yes, the covers are final

Sad reacts only. 😭😭😭

Looking forward to it! Will it be on Audible?

Yes, it will once launched! (Will is doing the audiobook) 

Did you consider getting a professional to do the audiobook?

EDIT: someone downvoted me. I'm not saying Will won't do a good job, but he clearly won't do as good a job as a professional. Picking someone with great rep could widen the appeal of the audiobook.

Yeah I thought about this a lot, but I strongly prefer audiobooks to be read by the author, and anecdotally other people do, too. I didn't read DGB (to save time), and regretted that decision.

Fair enough, and to be honest I suspect a lot of people will find it more authentic to hear the author read it. I don't really listen to audiobooks myself. I'm sure you'll do a great job!

Thank you!!! For efficiency, I almost only read books by audio now, so as self-declared expert, I agree books read by the author are superior because the author understands the meaning, inflection, and nuance in their words.  I think it added value to WWOTF. 

I most recently read Winners Take All by Anand Giridharadas, read by the author, and cannot help but feel moral unease about EA position in the philanthropic world right now.  He  makes a defensible argument for politics as the means of doing the most good.

While I am here, humbly, I need to ask a burning question: Your advocacy and behaviour are incongruent with respect to consumption; you consume in a degrowth pattern, but advocate for growth, why?

Stephen Fry? (He did a very good job with Harry Potter)

Is there a difference between ordering from Amazon, Barnes and Noble, or somewhere else?

Not for now! It's valuable to have pre-orders a different booksellers, and we think the distribution of where people naturally end up ordering from is likely to be optimal. 

Very excited to see this! Hoping to pre-order enough books to have Christmas and birthday presents for years to come...

Pre-ordered. And really excited :)

Hi Will, 

How do you feel this book fits into the fidelity model of communication advocated by CEA? 

Thanks!

Looks like this will be released on August 16 ( US), and September 1 (UK). Seems like a good time to signal boost. 

Do copies bought/pre-ordered outside the US count for The New York Times Bestseller list? 

They do not count for the NYT bestseller list, but they do count for your respective national bestseller list

William this is fantastic news!  Congratulations. I am pre-ordering it.

I would like to invite you to present and discuss this book at one of the most important sciences and philosophy festivals in Italy, next October, how can I contact you directly?

Is there a preview anywhere? One of the biggest factors for me in buying any book is writing style ; if it isn't compatible with how my brain parses things, or is unpleasant somehow, there's no point. Generally to evaluate whether I want to give a book a chance I just open to somewhere in the middle and read a couple paragraphs or even just a couple lines in the case of fiction (believe it or not, this has yielded fantastic results for me on a large sample size). Thirty bucks is too much for me sight unseen. 

You may be interested in the preview available for Will's last book.*

* Last non-academic book

do you know if Scribd will have this book in their library?

Yes, it will!

Curated and popular this week
 ·  · 5m read
 · 
[Cross-posted from my Substack here] If you spend time with people trying to change the world, you’ll come to an interesting conundrum: Various advocacy groups reference previous successful social movements as to why their chosen strategy is the most important one. Yet, these groups often follow wildly different strategies from each other to achieve social change. So, which one of them is right? The answer is all of them and none of them. This is because many people use research and historical movements to justify their pre-existing beliefs about how social change happens. Simply, you can find a case study to fit most plausible theories of how social change happens. For example, the groups might say: * Repeated nonviolent disruption is the key to social change, citing the Freedom Riders from the civil rights Movement or Act Up! from the gay rights movement. * Technological progress is what drives improvements in the human condition if you consider the development of the contraceptive pill funded by Katharine McCormick. * Organising and base-building is how change happens, as inspired by Ella Baker, the NAACP or Cesar Chavez from the United Workers Movement. * Insider advocacy is the real secret of social movements – look no further than how influential the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights was in passing the Civil Rights Acts of 1960 & 1964. * Democratic participation is the backbone of social change – just look at how Ireland lifted a ban on abortion via a Citizen’s Assembly. * And so on… To paint this picture, we can see this in action below: Source: Just Stop Oil which focuses on…civil resistance and disruption Source: The Civic Power Fund which focuses on… local organising What do we take away from all this? In my mind, a few key things: 1. Many different approaches have worked in changing the world so we should be humble and not assume we are doing The Most Important Thing 2. The case studies we focus on are likely confirmation bias, where
 ·  · 2m read
 · 
I speak to many entrepreneurial people trying to do a large amount of good by starting a nonprofit organisation. I think this is often an error for four main reasons. 1. Scalability 2. Capital counterfactuals 3. Standards 4. Learning potential 5. Earning to give potential These arguments are most applicable to starting high-growth organisations, such as startups.[1] Scalability There is a lot of capital available for startups, and established mechanisms exist to continue raising funds if the ROI appears high. It seems extremely difficult to operate a nonprofit with a budget of more than $30M per year (e.g., with approximately 150 people), but this is not particularly unusual for for-profit organisations. Capital Counterfactuals I generally believe that value-aligned funders are spending their money reasonably well, while for-profit investors are spending theirs extremely poorly (on altruistic grounds). If you can redirect that funding towards high-altruism value work, you could potentially create a much larger delta between your use of funding and the counterfactual of someone else receiving those funds. You also won’t be reliant on constantly convincing donors to give you money, once you’re generating revenue. Standards Nonprofits have significantly weaker feedback mechanisms compared to for-profits. They are often difficult to evaluate and lack a natural kill function. Few people are going to complain that you provided bad service when it didn’t cost them anything. Most nonprofits are not very ambitious, despite having large moral ambitions. It’s challenging to find talented people willing to accept a substantial pay cut to work with you. For-profits are considerably more likely to create something that people actually want. Learning Potential Most people should be trying to put themselves in a better position to do useful work later on. People often report learning a great deal from working at high-growth companies, building interesting connection
 ·  · 31m read
 · 
James Özden and Sam Glover at Social Change Lab wrote a literature review on protest outcomes[1] as part of a broader investigation[2] on protest effectiveness. The report covers multiple lines of evidence and addresses many relevant questions, but does not say much about the methodological quality of the research. So that's what I'm going to do today. I reviewed the evidence on protest outcomes, focusing only on the highest-quality research, to answer two questions: 1. Do protests work? 2. Are Social Change Lab's conclusions consistent with the highest-quality evidence? Here's what I found: Do protests work? Highly likely (credence: 90%) in certain contexts, although it's unclear how well the results generalize. [More] Are Social Change Lab's conclusions consistent with the highest-quality evidence? Yes—the report's core claims are well-supported, although it overstates the strength of some of the evidence. [More] Cross-posted from my website. Introduction This article serves two purposes: First, it analyzes the evidence on protest outcomes. Second, it critically reviews the Social Change Lab literature review. Social Change Lab is not the only group that has reviewed protest effectiveness. I was able to find four literature reviews: 1. Animal Charity Evaluators (2018), Protest Intervention Report. 2. Orazani et al. (2021), Social movement strategy (nonviolent vs. violent) and the garnering of third-party support: A meta-analysis. 3. Social Change Lab – Ozden & Glover (2022), Literature Review: Protest Outcomes. 4. Shuman et al. (2024), When Are Social Protests Effective? The Animal Charity Evaluators review did not include many studies, and did not cite any natural experiments (only one had been published as of 2018). Orazani et al. (2021)[3] is a nice meta-analysis—it finds that when you show people news articles about nonviolent protests, they are more likely to express support for the protesters' cause. But what people say in a lab setting mig